|
|
By: Hari Sud
April 28, 2007
Views
expressed here are author’s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer
is at the bottom.
Feedback
Related articles
India Russia
Nuclear issue: Indian media is silent about it
Dr.Dipak Basu
End of The Indo-US Nuke Deal?
Dr.Dipak Basu
What If India-US Nuclear Deal Fails
Hari Sud
USA"s nuclear design on India
Dr.Dipak Basu
Discord on Indo–US Nuclear Deal
Hari Sud
Indo-US nuclear Deal and its consequences
Dr.Dipak Basu
N-Deal: Plan B if the Deal Fails
Hari Sud
US Legislative Process: Indo-US N-Deal
Hari Sud
N-deal: Economic, Political and
Technological Aspects
Hari Sud
Indo-American Nuclear Pact - Rationales
Gaurang Bhatt
India"s Nuclear Surrender to USA
Dr.Dipak Basu
P-6 and The Nuclear Truth Narayanan
Komerath
India's Options to Pakistan's Nuclear Threat
Hari Sud
Cost Pakistan Incurred to Build the Nuclear Bomb
Hari Sud
Nuclear Black Market in Pakistan
Abhijit Bagal
Has America Gained Control of Their Nuclear Weapons?
Hari SudIf the India – US Nuclear deal fails, that is a bad news for Indian
Industry and Agriculture. This deal was in the making for years, except
that the Manmohan Singh’s government seized the initiative. Initial
euphoria of Bush-Manmohan agreement of 2005 evaporated as the US Nuclear
lobby, got into high gear. This lobby got its massive support from ex
Clinton Administration officials and few left over stalwarts of Jimmy
Carter Administration officials, who had drafted the NPT Treaty and its
offshoot NSG. Both these previous Administrations had made NPT and NSG as
center stage of their nuclear foreign policy. All in all, NPT/NSG is a bad
set of rules basically designed to punish India and deny it high tech
hardware? In seventies India was economically weak (so was China except
China had UN Security Council veto in its pocket) and could be pushed
around. Never did the authors of the treaty ever think that times may
change, India may come from behind and achieve a phenomenal economic
success. Then it will be foolhardy to deny a nation of 1.1 Billion and a
Trillion dollar economy (expected in 2008-09) important aspects of
technology. With forgoing in mind, Bush and Manmohan decided to remedy the
imbalance and accept India as partner in nuclear energy development. The
same was not acceptable to the US nuclear lobby that worked hard to derail
the Indo-US Nuclear agreement. Finally whatever was passed, as Henry Hyde
Act in 2006 by the US Congress was a bit deviation from 2005
understanding? Later, India thought that the final operating rules and
regulations (123 Agreement) would circumvent whatever was left a bit
awkward in the Henry Hyde Act. It seems that negotiating 123 rules changes
is as difficult as getting the Henry Hyde Act passed thru the Congress.
Nuclear lobby may finally achieve its objective i.e. it may derail the
Indo-US Nuclear deal.
The Sticking Points
India does not wish to completely forgo right to conduct nuclear tests if
the provocation to its security are too great or would never give up
technology development on Fast Breeder Reactors nor will it stop
processing spent fuel. The Bush-Manmohan agreement was innocuous sort of
deal of two heads of government, which realized each other’s importance in
strategic terms, struck this deal. India needs US for continued economic
progress. US need India to get the best out of India’s brainpower for
cheap IT, BPO and KPO services. Also India is the only ally US has in the
Indian Ocean Littoral States, which will ensure open sea lanes from Suez
to Singapore and keep Pakistan and its Mullahs in check. This sort of
understanding of each other’s position should be sufficient to facilitate
each other’s interest. Then why was the US Lobby allowed to raise
objections and get its way (partially) during the passage of Henry Hyde
Act? Part of the reason is a politically weakened President Bush with lack
of success in Iraq. When the Henry Hyde act was passed, he was fighting
for his party’s political survival in the Congressional Elections.
Opposition took note of it and extracted a pound of flesh with the Act not
clearly saying that India is welcomed in the nuclear fraternity. Hence,
today’s discussions on 123 rule changes is taking long and may even become
fruitless. India may walk out of the deal and economies on both sides may
suffer.
What Does India do to Offset Failed Indo-US Nuclear Agreement?
By the end of this year if 123 Agreement is not concluded satisfactorily,
India will be left with little choice but to quietly forgo the nuclear
deal. Indications are already beginning to emerge. First, Nicholas Burn’s
(US State Department Official) statement after he met with his Indian
counterpart recently that the US has done, whatever it could do for the
deal, now it is Indian turn. He was highlighting US’s inability to move
around the above-mentioned sticking point in the Henry Hyde Act. Second,
India developed a renewed interest in gas from Iran, after putting it on
back burner for a year. Third, a row over procurement of banned hardware
by India in US is putting strain on negotiations. US cannot play hardball
on this. They have been accused of spying in high a places like Prime
Minister’s Office.
India has meager natural resources of its own to generate Power. Almost
all the hydropower, barring a few in J&K, Himachal Pradesh and Uttaranchal
Pradesh has been tapped. India does not have in-exhaustible Coal supply.
Moreover excessive Coal burning has a detrimental impact on the
environment. Natural gas discoveries in the Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal
are not large enough to satisfy the growing needs. Hence India is left
with two alternatives nuclear power or gas from Middle East. The latter
could come easily via pipeline thru Pakistan or with difficulty as
liquefied gas in tankers.
Current state of power generation in India is bleak. There is overall 12%
power shortage in the country. In some areas shortages are much higher.
Central and state governments generate bulk of the power 58% and 32%
respectively. Private sector generates a meager 10% of the total power.
Most of the power is generated using coal (60%). Hydro accounts for 26%,
gas accounts for 10% and nuclear accounts for 3% of power generated.
Remaining 1% is generated using a mix of diesel and fuel oil.
As the economy grows at 8-9% a year for the next 15 years, power
generation will have to fill up the previous gap plus grow at a rate of
about 10% per year. That means, unless power generation capacity boosts up
well above 10-12% a year, Indian industry and agriculture will find
difficult to maintain the momentum it has created in last 5 years.
Hence nuclear or gas has to come to the rescue. Today, gas to India will
find a difficult going. First, US are totally and completely opposed to
it. Second, using hostile Pakistani territory with high transit fees makes
it totally uneconomical. Also, unhappy US could forbid its companies and
European subsidiaries to bid on gas pipeline contracts. It may deny
monetary support, which will make implementation of this project
impossible. In addition, Pakistan will collect huge sums of money (as much
as $500 million a year) in transit fees. These amounts are sufficient to
arm Pakistan with newer weapons.
Current nuclear installed capacity in India is 3,000 Mega Watts. By 2030,
this has to be boosted to about 30,000 Mega Watts. Hence, in next 20 years
about 27 nuclear generation units, each with 1,000 Mega Watt capacities
will have to be built at a cost of $100 Billion. This is a huge business,
which any country would wish to have. US are first in the line. In
addition, countries like Australia, Canada and US will also benefit
immensely with Uranium exports. India has no Uranium of its own. Most of
it will be imported. Hence, it is difficult to understand why US
Administration and politicians are being stingy in finalizing the deal.
Alternative to gas & nuclear is coal. Rough estimates are that to generate
that much power using domestic and imported coal, an additional 130
million tons of carbon dioxide will enter the atmosphere. That will bring
catastrophic change to the environment and hasten end of the planet earth.
Hence, nuclear deal is not only important to India but also to the rest of
the world.
Let us hope that US & Indian politicians and officials cool off the
rhetoric and begin a serious task of circumventing a few misunderstanding
in the Henry Hyde Act. If it requires that a supplementary law be enacted
by the US, which removes all the misgivings in the aforementioned Act, so
be it.
Hari Sud
Send your views to author
Do you wish to reach our readers?
submit your guest column
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and not of this
website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this
article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy,
completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or
any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this
page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by
others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or web listing page
URL) without the prior permission from
us and the author. |
Previous articles by:
Hari Sud
India’s Second Green Revolution
Discord on Indo–US Nuclear Deal
2012 Must Be A Defining Year for India
India on Roll, but China West"s Darling
Crush Present Day Jihadi by Throttling Money..
Diamonds & Jewelry, India in the Lead
Perfect Storm – Last 2 years of Bush Preside..
WTO & India
India, China - Primary Manufacturers of Worl...
Next India-Pakistan War will be over...
Western media thrives on Indian poverty
N-Deal: Plan B if the Deal Fails
Vanishing Poverty and Slums in India
US Legislative Process: Indo-US N-Deal
N-deal: Economic, Political and Techno...
All articles by:
Hari Sud |