|
|
By:
Hari Sud
September 25, 2004
Only about 45 days left for US presidential elections and Democratic Party
candidate, senator John Kerry is in dead heat with incumbent President
Bush in opinion polls (read in between the lines – trailing). In fact
momentum was lost to President Bush immediately after the Republican Party
convention early in September. The battle ground states, which were won
over by the Democrats in the previous contest, are showing a bit of
reluctance to vote Democrat this November. For a common person in the
street, unattached to either Democrats or Republicans, it would appear
that this election is no contest. The incumbent is supposed to loose. The
reasons are:
• A sputtering economy, full of mixed message on all sectors of economic
activity.
• Things going badly in Iraq War with American death toll crossing over
one thousand and rising everyday.
• Oil prices an at all time high of $45 a barrel and still climbing.
• Osama Bin Laden nowhere in American grasps.
• European allies are a mixed bag with British steadfast in their support
on Iraq and other allies deserting the American cause.
• Al Qaeda threatening more attacks on US soil.
• And the master of disguises and switching sides, General Pervez
Musharraf in Pakistan is badly bogged down in the tribal war in the
Pakistan-Afghan border while searching for Al Qaeda. He has promised all
kinds of support to the US.
With so many negatives to President Bush’s credit one may ask - why people
in the main street America are indicating their support to President Bush?
The answer lies exclusively in the TV image of John Kerry and bad advice
he is getting on issues of the day.
What is John Kerry saying and why is he not being heard?
John Kerry is saying that::
• Iraq war is no longer a patriotic war for America’s freedom. It is being
executed on a flawed judgment on Weapons of Mass Destruction. It should be
ended.
• Some of the ills of the economy are due to tax breaks, which President
Bush handed over to the very rich of America..
• Outsourcing is bad for economy and is responsible for high unemployment
rate in the urban white collard segment of the population.
• Oil prices are to be brought down with careful diplomacy after Iraq
withdrawal.
• Energies are to be refocused on terrorism, Afghanistan and building
strategic partnerships in Middle East. Effort to hunt Osama Bin Laden is
to be redoubled.
• If Pakistan is unable to grab Al Qaeda in Pakistan – Afghan border then
US troops are to be used.
• Befriend European allies again.
John Kerry is trying very hard to deliver his message. He is going to all
the US states and shaking hands and holding town hall meetings. But the
crowd enthusiasm is waning as is evident from the people turnout. Hence
everything is left to the print and electronic media to carry his message
to the rest of America. At the moment the media is neutral but distinct
advantage to candidate Bush has started to appear.
Does John Kerry’s Campaign need a Rescue?
Yes, it does. All what John Kerry is saying is worth listening to. Somehow
the delivery lacks the punch; hence not too many people are listening. As
a matter of fact this is what his problem has been since the beginning of
the year. He was not the frontrunner amongst the Democrats. That advantage
belonged to Jon Dean. Some how John Dean’s campaign imploded from within
offering John Kerry his chance. The party heavy weights favored him over
the other candidates. Confident Kerry raided Dean’s camp for talent and
got Dean’s best people to run his campaign. During the pre- convention
blitz, it appeared that Kerry was doing well among the Democrats. But
after his nomination by his party and President Bush’s nomination by his
party, it appears that Kerry’s message has been lost. The missing element
in his message is lack of crispness and his TV image, which has not been
polished to make him look loveable. With elections six weeks away, Kerry
has made some more changes to his campaign staff. These changes may or may
not work to lift his image but all this has definitely given President
Bush an advantage.
To everybody’s surprise this presidential contest in shaping up into a
personality contest as opposed to issues contest. Last two weeks have been
spent in debating whether Bush has a clean war services record or Kerry
has legitimate war medals to his credit. Surprisingly the CBS News joined
the fray only to relent a week later.
If it comes to personalities then Kerry has lost already. Bush has been
projected to be loveable, smiling and jovial character, reminiscent of
Ronald Reagan’s portrayal to the American public. Kerry on the other hand
is unable to shatter his dull, flip-flop and unfocussed image. Relatively
Bush is no intellectual giant. He is terribly dependant on his advisors of
questionable philosophies. A big percentage of American people believe
that Iraq war is not Bush’s doing but was created by his advisors in
Pentagon and including his Vice President. Kerry is lot smarter. He is
independent and a seasoned politician. He is too smart to carry forward a
bad advice. If Kerry wins, the American public could look forward to fast
US withdrawal from Iraq and refocus of energies on domestic issues. It
will be a replay of Bill Clinton’s election and focus back on economic and
social issues. The latter are key to the American prosperity.
Hence, here lays the problem in Kerry’s campaign i.e. delivery of the
message and polishing of the image.
Impact on India, Whether Kerry wins or Bush retains his Job.
Kerry has been a critique of outsourcing of IT and BPO jobs to India.
Hence India has to watch his election carefully. On the other hand he is a
strong critic of President Bush’s embrace of General Musharraf of
Pakistan. His campaign aids have repeatedly said that Pakistan continues
to be a transit point of terrorists worldwide including the current crop
of Arabs and Pakistanis who are fighting the Americans in Iraq. Also Kerry
does not like the present set-up in the US State Department. The latter is
a thorn on Indian side. Hence, India should welcome Kerry’s election. But
India also has to watch for its business interests.
Bush is making a few kind noises towards India. A few days back he removed
some restrictions on import of technology to India’s nuclear program. But
the cost he is asking India to pay is very high. India’s arch enemy
Pakistan is being armed with high tech weapons, pumped with free money,
human rights abuses in Balochistan, Pakistan Occupied Kashmir etc. are
overlooked and General Musharraf is encouraged to keep his military as
well as the President’s job after squelching democracy at home. Ask any
Indian diplomat in New York and he will tell you that US is too soft with
Musharraf. During Bill Clinton era outright support to Musharraf was not
possible. He would have linked military and economic aid to catching Osama
Bin Laden. I belive Kerry if elected will do the same.
The Indian Diaspora in US is a bit confused. They generally wish to
support Democrats, but this time around they are unable to do so because
of Kerry’s anti BPO assertions. They are also a bit confused on Kerry’s
attitude towards Pakistan, which he has never clarified. Bush is going all
the way to court the votes of the people of Indian origin. One reason for
removing restriction on import of technology to India so close to the
elections has been to sway Indian origin votes to his favor. The flip side
is that he is going to reward General Musharraf in a much bigger way with
military hardware that too to sway Pakistani origin votes to his favor.
President Bush has my support if he reins in his State Department and be a
bit more realistic towards India. After all, India is a fully functioning
democracy and a strategic business partner. Pakistan cannot fulfill that
role. Kerry will be my choice, should Bush go too far in his encouragement
to General Musharraf.
Unless a serious turn around occurs in Kerry’s fortunes, he will still be
a senator after November Elections. But the white house will be President
Bush’s for next four years. On the other hand a serious challenge to
American military occupation in Iraq (also in Afghanistan) will undermine
President Bush’s second bid to his job. Capture of Osama Bin Laden will
strengthen President Bush’s claim.
Hari Sud
Do you wish to reach IndiaCause readers?
Write @ IndiaCause
Copyright and Disclaimer:
The author is solely responsible for the contents of the
opinion/column/letter. IndiaCause does not represent or endorse the
accuracy, completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal,
advice or any other information in the article. Our readers are free to
forward this page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or
distributed by others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or
weblisting page URL) without the prior permission from
IndiaCause and the author. |
Previous
by:
Hari Sud
Will US Tilt to Pak, If
Indo-Pak Hostilities break out? September
05, 2004
November 2004 Elections IN US
August 23, 2004
Will US dump Pakistan
Eventually as an Ally? August
09, 2004
India’s Options to Pakistan’s Nuclear Threat
August 08, 2004
India – 2015
May 13, 2004
Cost Pakistan Incurred to
Build the Nuclear Bomb April 17, 2004
How India Lost it’s War
Fighting Traditions.....
April 05, 2004
India Shining and the British Media
March 31, 2004
BPO - Serving America and the
West with Pleasure
March 09, 2004
Any International Laws, That
Could Prosecute A Q Khan?
February 28, 2004
Has America Gained Control of
Their Nuclear Weapons?
February 22, 2004
Disband US State Department"s
Nuke Proliferation Lobby
February 12, 2004
End Muslim Terrorism by Ending
Wahabism Influence in SA February 01, 2004
BPO Backlash in USA & UK and
Elections Year Politics
January 25, 2004
India, Pakistan Dialogue – Who
could spoil the Party? January 16,
2004
Iran’s Disclosure of Pak’s Aid
and Ceasefire in Kashmir
January 08, 2004
Strategic Importance of
Pakistan August 23, 2003
India - The Strategic Partner
of USA
July 19, 2003
US Aid and Mood of the Masses in Pakistan
July 12, 2003 |