Articles Comments

Blog site of » Hinduism, India, Islam, Pakistan, World » Mohammad Iqbal”s “Hindustan Hamara” is the National Song of Pakistan

Mohammad Iqbal”s “Hindustan Hamara” is the National Song of Pakistan

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Mohammad Iqbal and Communalism in modern India: Iqbal’s Hindustan is the Mughal India as Dar-Ul-Islam – We are Muslims and the whole world is our homeland.

Iqbal was the greatest political thinker of the Muslims in British India. Although he was described as a Sufi, his doctrine went counter to the quietism and acceptance preached by traditional Sufism. Iqbal’s philosophy was a rather militant doctrine of action, of fight to achieve an ideal placed before man, and this ideal was of that of a primitive Islam, which in Iqbal’s opinion was preached by the Prophet

He was one of the earliest proponent of the ‘Two Nation Theory’ after Syed Ahmed Khan, the founder of the Mohammedan Anglo-Oriental College, now Aligarh Muslim University. One of the most prominent leaders of the All India Muslim League, Muhammad Iqbal encouraged the creation of a “state in northwestern India for Muslims” under the British rule. In his Presidential Address at the All-India Muslim League Session at Allahabad in 1930, he suggested that for the healthy development of Islam in South-Asia, it was essential to have a separate Muslim state at least in the Muslim majority regions of the north-west of British India. Later on, in his correspondence with Muhammad Ali Jinnah, he included the Muslim majority areas in the north-east also in his proposed separate nation for the Muslims.

Iqbal, just like Jinnah, has three phases in his life. He has started as a nationalist, then he became a staunch loyalist of the British Raj, ultimately he  became the philosopher-creator of Pakistan. The early phase was characterised by three categories of poems – (i) Ghazals and lyrics (e. g, Gul-i-Pashmurdah); (ii) romanticist and nature poems (e.g “The Himalayas”, “Kashmir” and “On the Bank of Ravi”) and (iii) patriotic and nationalistic poems. To this last category belongs poems like Hindustan Hamara, Hindustani Bachoon Ka Qaumi Geet, Naya Shiwala, and Taswir-i-Dard. Unfortunately those in India promote Iqbal forgot to read the poems in full, where he had glorified the Muslim conquests in general.

After his return from Britain and Europe, Iqbal later has transformed himself. While he was in jail in 1932, Mahatma Gandhi decided that Iqbal had become anti-nationalist. After going through an account of Iqbal’s speech to the Muslim League published in the newspaper, Mahatma Gandhi commented: “Other Muslims too share Iqbal’s anti-nationalism; only they do not give expression to their sentiments. The poet now disowns his song Hindustan Hamara”.  However, Gandhi never knew that ‘Hindustan’ of Iqbal is a pan-Muslim concept, alien to Gandhi’s concept of India.

Iqbal was against secularism and was a fanatical Muslim. In his book, The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam, he expressed fears that secularism would weaken the spiritual foundations of  Muslim society. India’s Hindu-majority population would destroy Muslim heritage, culture and political influence.

In a letter to Jinnah on 21 June 1937, Iqbal wrote: “Why should not the Muslims of north-west India and Bengal be considered as nations entitled to self-determination just as other nations in India and outside India are”? Iqbal approved the concept of Aurangzeb that “the strength of Islam in India depended not on the goodwill of its inhabitants but on the strength of the ruling Muslims”. Aurangzeb, according to Iqbal, was the “first exponent of Muslim nationalism in the Indian sub-continent”.

Tarana-e-Milli, written by Iqbal, reveals his mindset. “China and Arabia are ours. India is ours .We are Muslims and the whole world is our homeland. We have grown up in the shadow of swords. Our mascot is the crescent shaped dagger. Our prayer calls have reverberated in the valleys of the west. The force of our flow could not be stopped by anyone”.

Iqbal’s ‘Hindustan’ has nothing to do with India, but it is a mythical land for the Muslims.  He evolved a synthetic concept of ‘Muslim’ nationalism, which should be according to Iqbal, a multi-nationalism within Islam. He had promoted that concept of communalism in a message to the Central Khilafat Committee, Bombay, on March 10, 1922.

Iqbal wrote, “Communalism is its higher aspect, is indispensable to the formation of a harmonious whole in a country like India. The units of Indian society are not territorial as in European countries. ….The principle of European democracy cannot be applied to India without recognizing the fact of communal groups. The Muslim demand for the creation of a Muslim India within (British) India is, therefore, perfectly justified.” Initially Iqbal sought a Muslim province with the British India, as he was then a loyal servant of the British Empire. Later, when it was clear after 1935 reform, that the British would give India a kind of self-rule sooner or later, Iqbal demanded a separate state.

Iqbal considered the Koran not only as a book of religion in the traditional sense, but also a source of foundational principles upon which the infrastructure of any organization must be built as a coherent system of life. In his Rumuz-e-Bekhudi (Hints of Selflessness), Iqbal seeks to prove the Islamic way of life is the best code of conduct for a nation’s viability.

In Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam he wrote: “I confess to be a pan-Islamist. The mission for which, Islam came into this world will ultimately be fulfilled, the world will ultimately be purged of infidelity and the worship of false gods, and the true soul of Islam will be triumphant. This is the kind of pan-Islamicism that I preach”. “Islam as a religion has no country”. In his zeal to promote the unity of the Muslims, he has no hesitation to falsify the world history, when he wrote, “The history of Islam tells us that the expansion of Islam as a religion is in no way related to the political power of its followers”; and again “that Islam gained its greatest and most lasting missionary triumphs in times and places in which its political power has been weakest, as in South India and Eastern Bengal.” Karl Marx in his book ‘Notes on Indian History’ would have seriously disagreed with Iqbal for this concocted history, when Marx has described in detail the destruction of Vijaya Nagar in South India by the Muslim invaders and the Muslim invasion of Bengal.

Iqbal did supported Muslim conquests by various means. He writes to Miss Farquharson:   “The Jews also have no right over Palestine. They had bid farewell to Palestine willingly long before its occupation by Arabs.” [Miss Farquharson was the President of the National League of England. Iqbal’s letters dated July 30 and September 30, 1937 respectively, regarding Palestine, are included in Iqbal Namah (Makatib I Iqbal) Vol. 1, pp. 446-50]

About the Jews he wrote:

“The usurious Jews are waiting since long

To whose deceit the prowess of the tiger is no match

The West is bound to fall by itself like a ripe fruit

Let us see in whose lap the West falls”

About the Muslim conquest of Spain, Iqbal wrote in his poem A Ia mosquée de Cordoue:

“Oh! Holy Mosque of CórdobaOnly in a true Muslim’s heart”

Shrine for all lovers of art
Pearl of the one true faith
Sanctifying Andalusia’s soil

Like Holy Mecca itself
Such a glorious beauty
Will be found on earth

[The so-called Holy Mosque of Cordoba was created by demolishing a massive Christian Cathedral, when most parts of Spain was occupied in 711 by the Muslims of Morocco.  Later in 1236, Córdoba was liberated by King Ferdinand III, who had turned it back into a Christian church.]   

The common Muslim idea that ‘“ We came to Hindustan and we ruled’ is reflected in Iqbal’s poem ‘Sare Jahase Acha’, where he wrote:

“Our caravan landed on the banks of your Ganges”,

That indicates Muslim conquest of India. Iqbal’s Hindustan is the Mughal India as Dar-Ul-Islam, where Muslims were the rulers, and Hindus were subjugated.

Iqbal also wrote his Shikwah in sorrowful remembrance of the failure of the Muslim invasion in India, when he mourned that the invincible armada of the Muslims, that had swept over so many seas and rivers, met its watery grave in the Ganges. Iqbal wept over the defeat of Islam in India and elsewhere in the past, and looked forward to a re-conquest.  He wrote:

“Qahar to yeh hai ke kafir ko mile Hur-o-qusur

Aur bichaare Muslmaan ko faqt vada i Hur . . .”

“The shameful thing is that Kafirs enjoy Houries in this life

But Poor Muslims have only a promise of Houries in after life”

His two poems Shikwa (complaint) and Jawab-I-Shikwah (Reply to the Complaint) are about the Muslim revivalists in India who were for the separation from India in both spirit and political rehabilitation to his proposed Pakistan. These poems are in the form of a complaint before Allah, about the adverse circumstances in which the Indian Muslims had fallen, and the sequel, given the remedies prescribed by God for Muslim upliftments.

Mysticism and Iqbal:

Iqbal in Pakistan is being propagated as a mystic poet. In India he is propagated as a Sufi. Both of these ideas are wrong. As Iqbal did his PhD in Persian Philosophy in the University of Munich, Iqbal’s so-called mysticism was heavily influenced by two German philosophers, Emile Durkheim and Friedrich Nietzsche, both of whom are considered to be the philosopher of the Nazism.

Nietzsche was in turn influenced by the Persian philosopher Zorathrustra. Nietzsche’s thought was that of a Superman  or the Übermensch. In his book, ‘Thus Spoke Zarathustra’, Nietzsche wrote, “ “The Overman is the meaning of the earth. Man is a rope, tied between beast and Overman, he is a bridge and not an end.”

Iqbal has interpreted the basic element in Nietzsche’s idea , the “will to power” (der Wille zur Macht), as the basis for understanding human behavior. The natural condition of life and the struggle to survive are less important than the desire to expand one’s power. Iqbal has a critical view of mysticism. He believes that life is activity, and a person having communication with God cannot be a passive individual. A human being, coming in touch with the Supreme Being gets illuminated. He becomes a moving spirit in the society. It seems that such an individual is having a burning fire within him and he is part of God’s activity in this world.

Iqbal urges for the restoration of the Caliphate, and seeks that mobilization of the spirit which would make it:

“To once again establish,

The foundation Khilafah in the world,

You must bring from somewhere,

The mettle of your ancestors.”

“Out of the seclusion of the desert of Hejaz,

The Guide of the Time is to come.

And from this far, far away valley,

The Caravan is to make its appearance.”

[in Khidr-e-Waqt]

Iqbal has translated a number of poems of the Turkish poet Ziya Gokalp, pseudonym of Mehmed Ziya, who had promoted the Pan-Turkic Muslim Empire, from China to Europe, the dream of Iqbal. Ziya used the writings of Dukheim to repudiate secularism as a disuniting factor and proposed religion as a uniting force–all concepts found in Iqbal‘s Reconstruction of Islamic Thought (“Aik ho Muslim haram kee pasbani keh liyeh, Neel keh sahil seh ta ba khak e Kashghar”).

Iqbal claimed that his writings were influenced by ‘Surah e Nafas’ of the Koran, but in reality it reflects the views of Ziya who had translated the works of Émile Durkheim. Both Iqbal and Ziya concluded that Western ‘liberalism’, as a social system, was inferior to ‘solidarism’, because ‘liberalism’ encouraged ‘individualism’, which in turn diminished the integrity of the state. For Iqbal, religion is a mean to unify a population socially, and the life of the group was more important than the life of the individual.

Iqbal has rejected Sufism by saying in his book The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam that, “The rise and growth of ascetic Sufism… was developed under the influences of a non-Islamic character, a purely speculative side. The spirit of total other-worldliness in Sufism obscured men’s vision of a very important aspect of Islam as a social polity” (p21, p 221). Khalid Alavi has observed, “For Iqbal, Sufism is an activity and a “source of inspiration; but the unworthy occupants of spiritual seats have destroyed its image and spoiled its usefulness”. Iqbal accepted mystic experience or inner experience of the Sufis as a source of knowledge, but he has pointed out that The Koran declares that there are other  two sources of knowledge, history and nature, which Sufism does not acknowledges. Thus, it is wrong to say that Iqbal was a Sufi poet, as Iqbal did not appreciated the Sufi idea of universal love and existence of ‘The God’ in every creature, which had their origins in Hindu Bhakti movement of Sri Chaitannya and Ramanuj with its ultimate expression in Rabindranath Tagore. For Iqbal, “Sufi orders ….caused disintegration of the social cohesiveness of the Muslim community”.


Iqbal was against both democracy and secularism. The Muslim communalism in the British India had its origin in the fear of the Muslim of a democratic system with the majority rule, where Muslims would be a permanent minority, and in a romantic concept of the history of the Muslim conquests in Eurasia and North Africa, that had glorified  anti-Hindu sentiments.

Iqbal has promoted that  “Utopian intellectualization of the Muslims minority complex”, as  Nadeem  Paracha wrote in The Dawn on 24 Jan, 2010. To Iqbal, Indian nationalism that propagated a joint Hindu-Muslim struggle against the British, was contrary to the concept of a united Muslim Ummah, spanning from Morocco to Indonesia.  After a meeting with Egyptian and Palestinian Arab leaders in 1946, Mohammad Ali Jinnah has repeated the idea of Iqbal, “If a Hindu empire is achieved, it will mean the end of Islam in India, and even in other Muslim countries.”

Iqbal feared the exploitation of the Muslims in a Hindu-dominated future India, and as a result, promoted separatism among the Muslims. He said, in his 1930 speech for the creation of Pakistan, that “The Muslim demand ……is actuated by a genuine desire for free development which is practically impossible under the type of unitary government contemplated by the nationalist Hindu politicians with a view to secure permanent communal dominance in the whole of India.”

To achieve that dream he was prepared to go at any length when he wrote, “khanjar hilal ka ho qaumi nishan hamara”. He also said in his speech in 1930 in Allahabad, “India is a continent of human groups belonging to different races, speaking different languages and professing different religions.  …. To base a constitution on the conception of a homogeneous India …. is to prepare for a civil war”.

Islam, according to Iqbal, is a complete way of life. No other path is acceptable to God. So, in the absence of an Islamic polity, it is difficult for the Muslims to lead their lives entirely in accordance with the rules of Islam, which apply to social affairs as much as they do to personal affairs. Muslim’s duty must be to work to establish an Islamic dispensation in the lands where they live so that they can lead their lives fully in accordance with Islam and its laws.

Iqbal’s book in English, the Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam, expressed fears that not only would secularism weaken the spiritual foundations of Islam and Muslim society, but that India’s Hindu-majority population would crowd out Muslim heritage, culture and political influence. He thus became the first politician to articulate the Two-Nation Theory — that Muslims form a distinct nation and thus deserve political independence from other communities of India. Thus, it is a great shame that Indians, without reading Iqbal’s writings, accepted the poem Hindustan Hamara,  which is the National Song of Pakistan, as the most popular national song of India. It demonstrate that the campaign of the Aligarh school, to rewrite Indian history to glorify the Muslim invaders as social reformers, is highly successful due to the continuous support of a group of pro-Pakistani historians in India and their Western followers along with the assorted journalists in English language newspapers both in India and in the Anglo-American world. For them, both Mohammad Ali Jinnah and Mohammad Iqbal are the symbols of secularism and Hindi-Muslim unity, although they are the creator of Pakistan, due to which millions of people of all religions were butchered, and million more have lost all their livelihood.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Written by

I am now Professor in International Economics in Nagasaki University Japan. I did my PhD on model building for development planning in the University of Birmingham, UK. I was then Research Officer in Department of Applied Economics in Cambridge University and Lecturer in the Institute of Agricultural Economics in Oxford University. I have published 8 books and more than 70 papers in academic journals on economics.

Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this blog/article are the author's own and not of this website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this blog/article. This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy, completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice, quotes from other reference materials or any other information in the blog/article. The same disclaimer applies to all the comments on this blog/article. Our visitors are free to forward this page URL (web address) to others in emails or put the links on individual facebook, twitter webpages strictly for non-commercial use. But the entire article should not be published/republished on other sites without the prior permission from us.

Filed under: Hinduism, India, Islam, Pakistan, World · Tags: , ,

16 Responses to "Mohammad Iqbal”s “Hindustan Hamara” is the National Song of Pakistan"

  1. S.Ghosh says:

    Jinnah said on 14 August 1946 to ask the Muslims to start killing Hindus to get Pakistan ( Larke Lenge Pakistan) that ” We have the dagger and we have to use it”.

    Iqbal was the best friend of Jinnah.

  2. sanjithmenon says:

    “Iqbal has translated a number of poems of the Turkish poet Ziya Gokalp, pseudonym of Mehmed Ziya, who had promoted the Pan-Turkic Muslim Empire, from China to Europe, the dream of Iqbal. Ziya used the writings of Dukheim to repudiate secularism as a disuniting factor and proposed religion as a uniting force”
    this wrong, gokalp, was a Turkish Nationalist, not a pan islamist.

  3. You might be interested in this article:

    Mazhab Nahin Sikhata:

    Also “Deceiver of the Nation” which is a translation of Anwar Sheikh’s article:
    “Allama Iqbal: Gharatgar-e-Millat”

  4. S.Ghosh says:

    “Turkish Nationalist, not a pan islamist”

    Is it not true that a Turkic Nationalist means someone who wants to unify all countries occupied by the Turkic people in cluding Turkey ( which used to be called Anatolia, Lydia, Armenia during the days of Byzantine Empire), Azerbaizan, Iran, Caucasus, South Russia upto Kazan, Turmenistan, Uzbeckistan, Kirghezia, Tazikistan, Eastern Turkistan ( now called by the Chinese as Xingkiang), Mongolia ( the original home of the Turkic people).

    If this not a Pan-Islamism , what is this???

  5. S.Ghosh says:

    Suhail Ahmad Banglori:

    “In Allama Iqbal”s time, Hindu fanaticism was so great that they considered Muslims as low and impure. To associate with them, to eat and drink together was out of the question.”

    This is not true.

    My mother ( when she was a child) used to serve tea and food to the Muslim poet of Bengal Kazi Nazrul Islam, who used to come regularly to my great grandfather”s (who was a famous Bengali Hindu writer and editor of a Bengali literary magazine) house in Calcutta and stayed in many occasions, as Nazrul used to live in a small village near Burdwan about 100 miles away from Calcutta.

  6. observer says:

    look,it is a historical fact that all of the Muslim leadres were in Congress at one time,but when they saw the Intentions of Hindu/Sikh leaders,they came to the conclusion that once the British left India it will be an “open season” for muslim witch hunt.That is when they formed Muslim League and the rest is history.It was the narrow mindidness of the Hindu that led to the creation of Pakistan.Now if we go a little further back in history,we can note that contrary to the common belief that Jinnah originated the two-nation theory, actually it was Savarkar who propounded the theory years before the Muslim League embraced the idea. Savarkar had commanded all the Muslims to leave ‘Bharat’ to pave the way for the establishment of Hindu Rashtra. When Jinnah introduced his two-nation theory, Savarkar announced, “I have no quarrel with Mr. Jinnah’s two-nation theory… It is a historical fact that Hindus and Muslims are two nations.”
    “His (Savarkar’s) doctrine was Hindutva, the doctrine of Hindu racial supremacy, and his dream was of rebuilding a great Hindu empire from the sources of the Indus to those of the Brahmaputra. He hated Muslims. There was no place for them in the Hindu society he envisioned.” So the hate campaign against Muslims was well in place even before the partition of erstwhile British India. This and many other significant factors forced Jinnah to demand a separate nation for Muslims as he believed that Muslims would not be safe in India — a prophetic declaration indeed! There is no denying the fact that Jinnah was secular to the marrow and would never have wished to cut ties with India, but circumstances compelled him to do so. When Nathuram Godse pumped three bullets into Gandhi, a section of the Hindu community compared him with Judas. The writing was on the wall. The divide was evident. In some areas people mourned the death of Gandhi, and in other areas they distributed sweets, held celebrations, and demanded the release of Godse. Gandhi’s crime was that he had demanded security for Muslims.The seeds of partition were actually sown by the stalwarts of Hindu Mahasabha, primarily the quartet of Savarkar, Gawarikar, Apte, and Nathuram Godse. Independent India’s history is testimony to the fact that in a conflict between the forces of secular nationalism and religious communalism, the latter has always ruled the roost. Secular forces have more often than not ended up playing into the hands of communal forces. Such has been the history of independent India, and it is again on display in Jammu.When we look at all these facts one could only say that Muslim’s decision to demand for Pakistan was very justified and was the need of the time.

  7. Human says:


    Very thoughtful article. After researching various articles and history, I have come to the conclusion that most of the muslims believe in pan-nationalism. This type of ideology is very dangerous for any sovereign nation to survive and I’m amazed why not many intellectuals are coming forward and debating on this openly.

    For example, I have seen so many muslims feel sympathetic towards the cause of palestine or other muslim’s plight ONLY because they identify them as their brethren and their common denominator being “ISLAM”. It is not because of human compassion or kindness or justice, it is JUST because they identify those human beings as belonging to “ISLAM”.

    For example, what is happening in Europe? Muslims from around the world, go to europe and enjoy the benefits and life style offered by Europe, but show their hypocritical mind by saying all worst things about western culture and what not. They are trying to fight against the law, eg: the veil ban in France etc. When you are in a particular place then you should obey the law of the land, else you are free to go and live some where. And France, is a great secular model. All people irrespective of their religious affiliation are equal before the eyes of the law!

    The only way the world can be peaceful, is through the reform of muslims. Muslims must reform themselves and stopping waging wars and speaking of this “Ummah” business. We are living in a modern world and nations are a reality and you should live and abide and be patriotic to the nation where your life is centered. No more this “muslim ummah” business and no more this “kafir” business and no more this “Our’s is the only true religion” business.

    I’m sure, if any of the religions in the world, if even 10% as intolerant and fundamental as muslims, then muslims would be finished in this world. Crusades have happened in the past BUT christians have moved forward from it. In fact, all religions combined are way better than Islam when compared to modern day “religious terrorism”. Take any major conflict in the world, it invariably involves muslims. Why it is so, because a illiterate from pakistan is sent to Jihad in chechanya/kashmir/palestine etc. The pan-nationalism philosophy of Islam is a threat to any sovereign nation. It should be stopped. Islam needs reform and Muslims needs to show humanity and tolerance towards others. You people preach well BUT do not practice the sayings.

    I know very few minority of muslims are truly secular but majority have in their hearts this “muslim ummah” business and a dream of whole world being inhabited with muslims and so on.

    I hope muslims understand this and try to be tolerant to other religions and also to atheists. You are not the single dwellers of the place on earth, all people have equal rights.

    Muslim people preach peace BUT practice hatred towards non-muslims. Check out the situation in Saudi Arabia or Pakistan. NO religion in the entire world is as hateful as Islam towards other religions.

    Islam needs changes, if not then muslims need to change. You people should behave as humans and not like barbaric tribes who invaded all the peaceful lands of the natives during medieval periods.


  8. S Patel says:

    You state you studied in Birmingham UK. An area with a high Hindu Gujarati population and the true sons of Nathuram Godse (local mandirs were keen backers & high financial backers for Modi’s Gujurat genocide) so not surprised that you carry so much hate….just goes to prove that even an education cannot enlighten the moral mind.

    If a “only by name Muslim” Jinnah saw what the Hindu leaders had planned for the free sub continent (lest we forget all those Hindu leaders admiring & visiting Nazi Germany at the time) no wonder practising Muslims like Iqbal saw the light.

    You attack others but then are an avid enforcer of Hindutva!! You’re the same coin as those you attack.
    By the way the word Hind (Hindu> those of the land of Indus not those that follower Krishna) is Arabic!

  9. rishad says:

    Iqbal is the real patriot(love to india) his poem is famous in the world and respect it

  10. Play Hard says:

    Pakistan has already been dismembered once. 90,000 impotent Muslim cowards surrendered after committing years of attrocities against unarmed fellow Muslim citizens in what is now Bangladesh. The Islamic hellhole seems headed for another division and may end up disintegrating into 4 or 5 pieces. The real issue is that there is a large garbage population of Muslims inherited by us after agreeing to a partition of the subcontinent based strictly on religion. These Muslims should have been driven out of the country beginning in 1947.

    While other nations north of us were producing visionary leaders like Lenin, Stalin and Mao who made their countries strong within just a few decades, we could only come up with worthless losers like MKG and Pandit Nehru.

  11. gumshoe says:

    Pandit Nehru was an utter piece of trash. A blight on the nation in 1947 and a continuing national curse.

  12. anon says:

    MKG was the first ever leader with mass appeal to people
    from all over the subcontinent. They responded and
    came out in countless thousands to join his non-violent
    protests and the Quit India movement. He accelerated the
    demise of the christian crusaders in the country.

    Practically everything else he said and did has resulted in
    permanent, irreverisble damage to the ancient Vedic and
    post-Vedic civilization that had once prevailed everywhere
    throughout our subcontinent.

  13. shsharma says:

    When I hear this song sung in Hindusthan by children organised by ignorant indivisuals and organisations my hear bleeds .
    I thank Shri Deepak Basu who has exposed these two traitors and destroyers of Akhand Hindusthan.
    The seeds were planted by Sir SYED AHMED KHAN who started Aligarh Muslim University and then Iqbal while in England promoted the idea of Muslim nation Pakistan.
    P = for part of Punjab;K= for part of Kashmir
    s= part of Sindh,tan= for Baluchistan.=PAKISTAN
    Later Jinnah with help of Brishraj was able to get East and west Pakistan.
    East Pakistan is Bangladesh now’In 1905 Bengal was divided by British raj and that was the beginning of destruction of Akhand Bharat which Duratma M.K.Gandhi and Nehru failed to understand.
    Nehru was even ready to give entire present north east along with East Pakistan but nationalist leader from Assam saved our entire N.E.
    Maulana Nehru gave the present socalled Azad Kashmir[ P O K ].

  14. ThunD3rGoD says:

    @ S Patel,

    There is no denying the fact that the muslims appeasment practises have twisted the real history and barbarism practised by the Islamists since its advent in India and they always try to show various other incidents just to prove that they were not the ones to do so or why did they do it.(for e.g. Many muslims take heart from the fact that many Hindus carried genocide against Buddhist and Dravidian etc… Which is hardly the fact) . There is no denying the fact that people like you(Muslims and Muslim appeaser) have this dream of converting the whole world into Islam and therefore never recognise any other religion. For you are at war with non-believers and set out to preach the true religion to the world. Just imagine a day 2-3 centuries later when majority of the population would be Muslim(about 70-80% that would happen for sure) and the sharia law imposed. Muslims treat other people as the second class citizens and not the reverse. That’s the fact. Read the real history written by your own persian and arab historians about the blood massacre and the conversions performed by the sword. You are the sons of the mothers helplessly raped and forced to slave, prostitution and many other domestic crime. A true religion never preaches violence (Hindus do not have anything in their book like stoning women for adultery) Nor does it glorify the killer. Also Islam has nothing to do with finding the inner peace or spirituality is very limited in Islam. There is a lot of things I could write off but time’s limited. And no matter what argument with evidence I put forward you’ll always cite some other example as how badly Muslims are oppressed and how they are correct in everything they are doing.(Everything will be justified). IQBAL and Jinnah were a gaddar as you would expect majority of the muslims to be as for me if they prefer to be the sons of the God then to be the sons of their motherland and Gaddar and Kafir. I hope India soon finds a saviour like the Chatrapati shivaji Maharaj or Guru Arjan Dev and Guru Gobind singh. Long live India and Long live my Motherland. <3 India.

  15. karthik says:

    To Observer
    If “the narrow mindedness of the Hindu that led to the creation of Pakistan”, How is it that Muslims are enjoying more than equal rights in HINDU India, and why the hindus of East & west pakistan were eliminated in a genocide.

    If “Muslim leadres in Congress saw the Intentions of Hindu/Sikh leaders ,they came to the conclusion that once the British left India it will be an “open season” for muslim witch hunt”. Why this which hunt didn’t happen. Why the reverse (Hindu which hunt) is happening in India?

    If Muslim leaders are smart enough to Gauge the non-existing “evil intentions of Hindu/sikh leaders”, what is wrong if savarkar recognizes the inherently evil nature of ISLAM after a millennium of mayhem.

  16. karthik says:

    To Observer , May 3, 2011 at 9:20 AM

    If “the narrow mindedness of the Hindu that led to the creation of Pakistan”, How is it that Muslims are enjoying more than equal rights in HINDU India, and why the hindus of East & west pakistan were eliminated in a genocide.

    If “Muslim leadres in Congress saw the Intentions of Hindu/Sikh leaders ,they came to the conclusion that once the British left India it will be an “open season” for muslim witch hunt”. Why this which hunt didn’t happen. Why the reverse (Hindu which hunt) is happening in India?

    If Muslim leaders are smart enough to Gauge the non-existing “evil intentions of Hindu/sikh leaders”, what is wrong if savarkar recognizes the inherently evil nature of ISLAM after a millennium of mayhem.

    Tell me mr.Observer, do you mourn Gandhi Death ? I suppose, yes, since he was ready to permit Muslims to slaughter Hindus wholesale. No, we do not mourn his death. WE whole heartedly mourn his Birth and Deeds.

Leave a Reply


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>